Pentium 3561Y vs Celeron J3355
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2577 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Pentium |
Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2016) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
Release date | 30 August 2016 (7 years ago) | 1 January 2014 (10 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1296 | BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 11.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 500 | Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.75 | 0.83 |
Recency | 30 August 2016 | 1 January 2014 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 11 Watt |
Celeron J3355 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.
Pentium 3561Y, on the other hand, has 10.7% faster integrated GPU.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J3355 is a desktop processor while Pentium 3561Y is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355 and Pentium 3561Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.