EPYC 9275F vs Celeron J3355

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2663not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency7.10no data
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Turin (2024)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$3,439

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1296SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes6128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 320 Watt

Celeron J3355 has 3100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J3355 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 58 votes

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3355 or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.