Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Celeron J1900
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E3-1285 v4 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 574% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2980 | 1484 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.95 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Broadwell-DT (2015) |
| Release date | 1 November 2013 (12 years ago) | 2 June 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron J1900 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 160 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J1900 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCLGA1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E3-1285 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| eDRAM | no data | 128 MB |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | - | + |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron J1900 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E3-1285 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 29.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | Intel Iris Pro P6300 |
| Max video memory | no data | 32 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 48 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Xeon E3-1285 v4 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Xeon E3-1285 v4.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.65 | 4.38 |
| Recency | 1 November 2013 | 2 June 2015 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron J1900 has 850% lower power consumption.
Xeon E3-1285 v4, on the other hand, has a 573.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron J1900 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Xeon E3-1285 v4 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
