Ryzen 9 7900X vs Celeron J1900

Place in performance ranking	2637	113
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date	1 November 2013 (10 years ago)	26 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$82	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 7900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads	4	24
Base clock speed	2 GHz	4.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.42 GHz	5.6 GHz
L1 cache	224 KB	768 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	12 MB
L3 cache	2 MB L2 Cache	64 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	5 nm
Die size	no data	2x 70 (CCD) mm² + 122 (I/O) mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	47 °C
Number of transistors	no data	CCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 7900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM5 (LGA 1718)
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 7900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
Status	Launched	no data
RST	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 7900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 7900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 7900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 7900X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 7900X.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	4	24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.75

Ryzen 9 7900X 33.47
+4363%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1154

Ryzen 9 7900X 51765
+4386%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J1900 172

Ryzen 9 7900X 2959
+1620%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J1900 518

Ryzen 9 7900X 17997
+3374%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.75	33.47
Recency	1 November 2013	26 September 2022
Physical cores	4	12
Threads	4	24
Chip lithography	22 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	170 Watt

Celeron J1900 has 1600% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7900X, on the other hand, has a 4362.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 7900X is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 9 7900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.