Ryzen 7 7700X vs Celeron J1900
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 2996% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 7 7700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2606 | 207 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 56.41 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Raphael (Zen4) |
| Release date | 1 November 2013 (10 years ago) | 29 August 2022 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | $399 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 7 7700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 71+122 mm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9.9 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 7 7700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM5 (LGA 1718) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 7 7700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 7 7700X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 7 7700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-5200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 7 7700X.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 24 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Celeron J1900 by 2996% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Celeron J1900 by 3015% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Celeron J1900 by 1584% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Celeron J1900 by 2839% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.75 | 23.22 |
| Recency | 1 November 2013 | 29 August 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 105 Watt |
Celeron J1900 has 950% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 7700X, on the other hand, has a 2996% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 7 7700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7700X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Ryzen 7 7700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
