EPYC Embedded 3151 vs Celeron J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2697not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency6.81no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache224 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB512 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes432

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 21 February 2018
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron J1900 has 350% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3151, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3151 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and EPYC Embedded 3151, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
AMD EPYC Embedded 3151
EPYC Embedded 3151

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 196 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC Embedded 3151 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or EPYC Embedded 3151, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.