Celeron M 410 vs J1900

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2675	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Celeron M
Power efficiency	6.87	no data
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$82	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	4	1
Base clock speed	2 GHz	1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.42 GHz	1.46 GHz
Bus rate	no data	533 MHz
L1 cache	224 KB	no data
L2 cache	2 MB	no data
L3 cache	2 MB L2 Cache	1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	65 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	100 °C
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	no data	1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCBGA1170	PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	-
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	no data	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	36 Bit	32 Bit
FDI	-	no data
FSB parity	no data	-
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	+	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	4	1
Threads	4	1
Chip lithography	22 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	27 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Celeron M 410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---