Atom x3-3205RK vs Celeron J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2644not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Silvermont (2015)
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz1.2 GHz
L1 cache224 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3 1333 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesMali-450 MP4
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 2 March 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 2 Watt

Celeron J1900 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Atom x3-3205RK, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Atom x3-3205RK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
Intel Atom x3-3205RK
Atom x3-3205RK

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 191 vote

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom x3-3205RK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Atom x3-3205RK, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.