Atom E3826 vs Celeron J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72
+279%
Atom E3826
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.19

Celeron J1900 outperforms Atom E3826 by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26993248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAtom
Power efficiency6.812.57
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz1.47 GHz
L1 cache224 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel HD Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.72
+279%
Atom E3826 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1149
+278%
Atom E3826 304

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.19
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron J1900 has a 278.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom E3826, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J1900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3826 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Atom E3826, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
Intel Atom E3826
Atom E3826

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 197 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E3826 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Atom E3826, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.