Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Celeron J1900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72
+18%
Athlon 64 FX-74
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.61

Celeron J1900 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-74 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26972799
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.13
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency6.810.46
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache224 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data235 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170F
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.72
+18%
Athlon 64 FX-74 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1149
+18.2%
Athlon 64 FX-74 972

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.61
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron J1900 has a 18% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The Celeron J1900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-74 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-74 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Athlon 64 FX-74, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 197 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Athlon 64 FX-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.