Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Celeron J1850

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1850
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.62
Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.01
+2321%

Ryzen 7 6800HS outperforms Celeron J1850 by a whopping 2321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2789488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.6539.11
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache224 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FP7
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon 680M
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1850 0.62
Ryzen 7 6800HS 15.01
+2321%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1850 942
Ryzen 7 6800HS 22974
+2339%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 15.01
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron J1850 has 250% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 6800HS, on the other hand, has a 2321% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 6800HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1850 and Ryzen 7 6800HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1850
Celeron J1850
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
Ryzen 7 6800HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Celeron J1850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 187 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 6800HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1850 or Ryzen 7 6800HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.