EPYC 9475F vs Celeron J1800

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3052not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.43no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Turin (2024)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72$7,592

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed2.41 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache112 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron J1800 has 3900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron J1800 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 540 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.