Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Celeron G6900E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Hawk Point (2024) |
| Release date | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 2 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.85 | 18.32 |
| Recency | 4 January 2022 | 2 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 542.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 2.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G6900E is a desktop processor while Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900E and Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
