EPYC 9475F vs Celeron G5925
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2020 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Power efficiency | 2.86 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Turin (2024) |
Release date | 1 July 2020 (4 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $7,592 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 96 |
Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.65 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 4.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 256 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | no data | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 66,520 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | FCLGA1200 | SP5 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 58 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | N/A |
Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 July 2020 | 10 October 2024 |
Threads | 2 | 96 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 58 Watt | 400 Watt |
Celeron G5925 has 589.7% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 4700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G5925 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G5925 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.