Celeron G1820TE vs G555

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G555
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.90
+36.4%

G555 outperforms G1820TE by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25172722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size131 mm2177 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors504 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11551150
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD (Haswell)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G555 0.90
+36.4%
Celeron G1820TE 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G555 1388
+36.1%
Celeron G1820TE 1020

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 0.66
Recency 1 September 2012 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 54 Watt

Celeron G555 has a 36.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron G1820TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 20.4% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G555 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1820TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G555 and Celeron G1820TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G555
Celeron G555
Intel Celeron G1820TE
Celeron G1820TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Celeron G555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron G1820TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G555 or Celeron G1820TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.