Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Celeron G550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G550
2012, $80
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.73
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020, $5,500
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
47.27
+6375%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron G550 by a whopping 6375% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking294867
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.656.77
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency0.477.12
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)14 July 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$5,500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 310% better value for money than Celeron G550.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G550 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache64 KB (per core)4 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)32 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size131 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors504 million38740 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G550 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G550 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G550 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G550 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G550 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G550 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G550 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G550 0.73
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 47.27
+6375%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron G550 1275
Samples: 262
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 82745
+6390%
Samples: 184

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G550 395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 1570
+297%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G550 661
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 14237
+2054%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 47.27
Recency 1 June 2012 14 July 2020
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron G550 has 331% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, on the other hand, has a 6375% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G550 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G550 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 107 votes

Rate Celeron G550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 833 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G550 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.