Ryzen 5 7520U vs Celeron G530T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G530T
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.69
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.02
+772%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Celeron G530T by a whopping 772% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27321112
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency1.8036.60
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size131 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon 610M
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G530T 0.69
Ryzen 5 7520U 6.02
+772%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G530T 1056
Ryzen 5 7520U 9206
+772%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 6.02
Recency 4 September 2011 20 September 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 7520U has a 772.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7520U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G530T in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G530T is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G530T and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G530T
Celeron G530T
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Celeron G530T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1394 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G530T or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.