EPYC 9175F vs Celeron G530

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2713not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.03no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Turin (2024)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50$4,256

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size131 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1155SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 September 2011 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

Celeron G530 has 392.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G530 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G530 and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G530
Celeron G530
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 204 votes

Rate Celeron G530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G530 or EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.