Celeron 3205U vs G530

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G530
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.71
+18.3%
Celeron 3205U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.60

Celeron G530 outperforms Celeron 3205U by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26992795
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.033.79
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Broadwell-U (2015)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)1 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors504 million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Responseno data-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz800 MHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G530 0.71
+18.3%
Celeron 3205U 0.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G530 1123
+18.6%
Celeron 3205U 947

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G530 366
+36.6%
Celeron 3205U 268

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G530 620
+28.4%
Celeron 3205U 483

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.60
Recency 4 September 2011 1 March 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron G530 has a 18.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 3205U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3205U in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G530 is a desktop processor while Celeron 3205U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G530 and Celeron 3205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G530
Celeron G530
Intel Celeron 3205U
Celeron 3205U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 202 votes

Rate Celeron G530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 31 vote

Rate Celeron 3205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G530 or Celeron 3205U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.