Athlon 64 LE-1640B vs Celeron G530

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2588	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Lima (2008−2009)
Release date	4 September 2011 (12 years ago)	April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$50	no data
Current price	$51 (1x MSRP)	$25

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	2.7 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	128K
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	512K
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Die size	131 mm2	77 mm2
Maximum core temperature	69 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	65 °C
Number of transistors	504 million	122 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1155	AM2
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR2
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	17 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors	no data
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	45 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G530 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---