Xeon Gold 6330N vs Celeron G470
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 6330N outperforms Celeron G470 by a whopping 6258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3036 | 225 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.97 | 13.13 |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 42 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | 86 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2667 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.36 | 22.89 |
| Recency | 1 April 2013 | 1 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 28 |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 165 Watt |
Celeron G470 has 371.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6330N, on the other hand, has a 6258.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 2700% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Gold 6330N is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G470 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron G470 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6330N is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G470 and Xeon Gold 6330N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
