A6-5357M vs Celeron G465

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G465
2012
1 core / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.34
A6-5357M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.73
+115%

A6-5357M outperforms Celeron G465 by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G465 and A6-5357M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30722684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency0.921.97
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G465 and A6-5357M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors504 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G465 and A6-5357M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FP2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G465 and A6-5357M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G465 and A6-5357M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G465 and A6-5357M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G465 and A6-5357M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 8450G (533 - 720 MHz)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G465 and A6-5357M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G465 and A6-5357M.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G465 0.34
A6-5357M 0.73
+115%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G465 547
A6-5357M 1165
+113%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.73
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.88
Recency 1 September 2012 1 June 2013
Physical cores 1 2

A6-5357M has a 114.7% higher aggregate performance score, 14.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 months, and 100% more physical cores.

The A6-5357M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G465 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G465 is a desktop processor while A6-5357M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G465 and A6-5357M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G465
Celeron G465
AMD A6-5357M
A6-5357M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 6 votes

Rate Celeron G465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate A6-5357M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G465 or A6-5357M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.