Z-01 vs Celeron G460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G460
2011
1 core / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.30
+57.9%

Celeron G460 outperforms Z-01 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G460 and Z-01 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31053230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.813.00
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Desna (2011)
Release date12 December 2011 (12 years ago)1 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G460 and Z-01 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB1 MB
L3 cache1.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size131 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G460 and Z-01 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FT1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G460 and Z-01. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A, AMD-V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G460 and Z-01 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G460 and Z-01 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G460 and Z-01. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 6250
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G460 and Z-01 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G460 and Z-01.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G460 0.30
+57.9%
Z-01 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G460 469
+53.8%
Z-01 305

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 0.19
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.24
Recency 12 December 2011 1 June 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron G460 has a 57.9% higher aggregate performance score, 220.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Z-01, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Z-01 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G460 is a desktop processor while Z-01 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G460 and Z-01, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G460
Celeron G460
AMD Z-01
Z-01

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 30 votes

Rate Celeron G460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 11 votes

Rate Z-01 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G460 or Z-01, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.