Celeron N5095 vs G3950

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron G3950
2017
2 cores / 2 threads
1.52
Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads
2.67
+75.7%

N5095 outperforms G3950 by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20191598
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Value for money2.830.96
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Jasper Lake
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years old)11 January 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$52no data
Current price$48 (0.9x MSRP)$1654

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3950 has 195% better value for money than Celeron N5095.

Technical specs

Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus support8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-no data
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600DDR4, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3950 1.52
Celeron N5095 2.67
+75.7%

N5095 outperforms G3950 by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3950 2322
Celeron N5095 4095
+76.4%

N5095 outperforms G3950 by 76% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.52 2.67
Integrated graphics card 1.84
Recency 3 January 2017 11 January 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 15 Watt

The Celeron N5095 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3950 and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1141 vote

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3950 or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.