Athlon II X4 641 vs Celeron G3950

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron G3950
2017
2 cores / 2 threads
1.50
Athlon II X4 641
2012
4 cores / 4 threads
1.50

General info

Comparing Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20272033
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.830.15
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)6 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52no data
Current price$48 (0.9x MSRP)$16.26

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3950 has 1787% better value for money than Athlon II X4 641.

Technical specs

Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus support8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151FM1
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3950 1.50
Athlon II X4 641 1.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3950 2322
+0.4%
Athlon II X4 641 2313

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 3 January 2017 6 February 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 100 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3950 and Athlon II X4 641, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950
AMD Athlon II X4 641
Athlon II X4 641

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 138 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 641 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3950 or Athlon II X4 641, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.