Celeron M 390 vs G3950

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2159not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronCeleron M
Power efficiency2.71no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s400 MHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 21 Watt

Celeron G3950 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 390, on the other hand, has 142.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G3950 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 390 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3950 and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950
Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3950 or Celeron M 390, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.