Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Celeron G3930

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3930
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.40
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
18.33
+1209%

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Celeron G3930 by a whopping 1209% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2382390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.697.51
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency1.063.94
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)ZEN+ (2018−2019)
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 988% better value for money than Celeron G3930.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2935
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151Socket TR4
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s93.867 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610-
Max video memory64 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz-
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12-
OpenGL4.4-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G3930 1.40
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 18.33
+1209%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron G3930 2256
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 29474
+1206%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G3930 606
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 1254
+107%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G3930 1039
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 8468
+715%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 18.33
Recency 3 January 2017 13 August 2018
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 180 Watt

Celeron G3930 has 252.9% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, on the other hand, has a 1209.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G3930 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 262 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 61 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G3930 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.