Atom D525 vs Celeron G3930

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3930 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2192not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.62no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

Celeron G3930 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 610Intel GMA 3150
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930 and Atom D525.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3930 2249
+459%
Atom D525 402

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G3930 605
+686%
Atom D525 77

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G3930 1034
+453%
Atom D525 187

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 21 June 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 13 Watt

Celeron G3930 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 292.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G3930 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G3930 is a desktop processor while Atom D525 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3930 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 237 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 214 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3930 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.