EPYC 9575F vs Celeron G3900TE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900TE and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2362not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.35no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.14no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Turin (2024)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$11,791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900TE and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size98.57 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900TE and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketLGA-1151SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900TE and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900TE and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900TE and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900TE and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2015 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron G3900TE has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G3900TE and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron G3900TE is a notebook processor while EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900TE and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900TE or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.