A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron G3900TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.21
+21%

Celeron G3900TE outperforms A8 Pro-7150B by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23332460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.35no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency3.154.79
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB4096 KB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size98.57 mm2245 mm2
Number of transistorsno data2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketLGA-1151FP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900TE 1.21
+21%
A8 Pro-7150B 1.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900TE 1850
+21.1%
A8 Pro-7150B 1528

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 1.00
Recency 19 October 2015 4 June 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 19 Watt

Celeron G3900TE has a 21% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A8 Pro-7150B, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 84.2% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3900TE is our recommended choice as it beats the A8 Pro-7150B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900TE and A8 Pro-7150B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE
AMD A8 Pro-7150B
A8 Pro-7150B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 11 votes

Rate A8 Pro-7150B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900TE or A8 Pro-7150B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.