A6-9500E vs Celeron G3900T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900T
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.31
+14.9%

Celeron G3900T outperforms A6-9500E by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21742294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.847.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)27 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price$36 $32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A6-9500E has 846% better value for money than Celeron G3900T.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data+
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
VirusProtectno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX-no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Endurono data+
UVDno data+
VCEno data+
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.4no data
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900T 1.31
+14.9%
A6-9500E 1.14

Celeron G3900T outperforms A6-9500E by 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3900T 2030
+15.6%
A6-9500E 1756

Celeron G3900T outperforms A6-9500E by 16% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 1.14
Recency 19 October 2015 27 July 2017
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

The Celeron G3900T is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9500E in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron G3900T is a notebook processor while A6-9500E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900T and A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900T
Celeron G3900T
AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 25 votes

Rate Celeron G3900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 42 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900T or A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.