Xeon Gold 5317 vs Celeron G3900E

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Xeon Gold 5317 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2173	324
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.11	32.00
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Architecture codename	Skylake (2015−2016)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date	2 January 2016 (8 years ago)	6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	no data
Current price	$135 (1.3x MSRP)	$870

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5317 has 28991% better value for money than Celeron G3900E.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Xeon Gold 5317 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads	2	24
Base clock speed	no data	3 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	3.6 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	64K (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB	18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Die size	98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	84 °C
Number of transistors	1750 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Xeon Gold 5317 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	2
Socket	no data	FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon Gold 5317. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	no data	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+
TSX	no data	+
Status	no data	Launched

Security technologies

Celeron G3900E and Xeon Gold 5317 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+
SGX	no data	Yes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon Gold 5317 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon Gold 5317. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	LPDDR3-1866	DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size	64 GB	6 TB
Max memory channels	2	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	34.134 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel HD Graphics 510

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon Gold 5317.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	16	64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5317 outperforms Celeron G3900E by 1242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.32	17.71
Recency	2 January 2016	6 April 2021
Physical cores	2	12
Threads	2	24
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	150 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Xeon Gold 5317, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---