Xeon 6353P vs Celeron G3900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.27
Xeon 6353P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
17.21
+1255%

Xeon 6353P outperforms Celeron G3900E by a whopping 1255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2439429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18100.00
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.5025.52
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date2 January 2016 (9 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$426

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6353P has 55456% better value for money than Celeron G3900E.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Xeon 6353P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size98.57 mm2257 mm2
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Xeon 6353P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno data1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon 6353P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Celeron G3900E and Xeon 6353P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon 6353P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon 6353P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon 6353P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G3900E 1.27
Xeon 6353P 17.21
+1255%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron G3900E 2034
Xeon 6353P 27662
+1260%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 17.21
Recency 2 January 2016 24 February 2025
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G3900E has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6353P, on the other hand, has a 1255.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon 6353P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G3900E in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron G3900E is a notebook processor while Xeon 6353P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
Intel Xeon 6353P
Xeon 6353P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6353P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G3900E and Xeon 6353P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.