Ryzen Threadripper 3980X vs Celeron G3900E
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2569 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.18 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | 3.52 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 2 January 2016 (9 years ago) | 14 November 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 24 | 32 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 3 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 98.57 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 102.403 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 510 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 January 2016 | 14 November 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 48 |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 280 Watt |
Celeron G3900E has 700% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 3980X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron G3900E and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron G3900E is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3980X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
