Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Celeron G3900E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.27
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
14.65
+1054%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 outperforms Celeron G3900E by a whopping 1054% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2345502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.4549.70
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Krackan Point (2025)
Release date2 January 2016 (9 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR5, LPDDR5X
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510Radeon 860M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G3900E 1.27
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 14.65
+1054%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900E 2034
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 23473
+1054%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 14.65
Recency 2 January 2016 6 January 2025
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has a 1053.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.