Ryzen 3 7320C vs Celeron G3900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.16
Ryzen 3 7320C
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.68
+303%

Ryzen 3 7320C outperforms Celeron G3900E by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25111381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency1.4013.18
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release date2 January 2016 (9 years ago)23 May 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 3 7320C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die size98.57 mm2100 mm2
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 3 7320C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFT6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 3 7320C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 3 7320C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 3 7320C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 3 7320C.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G3900E 1.16
Ryzen 3 7320C 4.68
+303%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron G3900E Samples: 1 2034
Ryzen 3 7320C Samples: 8 8219
+304%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 4.68
Integrated graphics card 1.40 2.49
Recency 2 January 2016 23 May 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 7320C has a 303.4% higher aggregate performance score, 77.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G3900E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
AMD Ryzen 3 7320C
Ryzen 3 7320C

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 15 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G3900E and Ryzen 3 7320C, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.