Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Celeron G3900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.41
Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.76
+1089%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Celeron G3900 by a whopping 1089% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2228407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.182.27
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency2.5210.54
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$4,938

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 1161% better value for money than Celeron G3900.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0QPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier2824
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB5.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB55 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.57 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C70 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510N/A
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900 1.41
Xeon E5-2699A v4 16.76
+1089%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900 2165
Xeon E5-2699A v4 25654
+1085%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G3900 585
Xeon E5-2699A v4 1177
+101%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G3900 1001
Xeon E5-2699A v4 9546
+854%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 16.76
Recency 19 October 2015 25 October 2016
Physical cores 2 22
Threads 2 44
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 145 Watt

Celeron G3900 has 184.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2699A v4, on the other hand, has a 1088.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G3900 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900 and Xeon E5-2699A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 222 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 42 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900 or Xeon E5-2699A v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.