Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Celeron G3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.40
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
3.21
+129%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms Celeron G3900 by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21291526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.185.54
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Thuban (2010)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)1 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data
Current price$37 (0.9x MSRP)$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) has 2978% better value for money than Celeron G3900.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size150 mm2346 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151AM3
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX-no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900 1.40
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 3.21
+129%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms Celeron G3900 by 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G3900 2165
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 4965
+129%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms Celeron G3900 by 129% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 3.21
Recency 1 September 2015 1 May 2010
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 95 Watt

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 196 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1570 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900 or Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.