Pentium J3710 vs Celeron G1840

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1840
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.12
+21.7%
Pentium J3710
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.92

Celeron G1840 outperforms Pentium J3710 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23912516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.350.03
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Power efficiency1.9613.39
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Airmont (2016)
Release date1 May 2014 (10 years ago)10 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53$161

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1840 has 4400% better value for money than Pentium J3710.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.64 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i--
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Max video memory1.7 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz740 MHz
Execution Unitsno data18

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12+
OpenGL4.3+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data5
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1840 1.12
+21.7%
Pentium J3710 0.92

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1840 1777
+22%
Pentium J3710 1456

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G1840 483
+148%
Pentium J3710 195

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G1840 819
+46%
Pentium J3710 561

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 0.92
Recency 1 May 2014 10 January 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron G1840 has a 21.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Pentium J3710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 783.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G1840 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium J3710 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1840 and Pentium J3710, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1840
Celeron G1840
Intel Pentium J3710
Pentium J3710

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 238 votes

Rate Celeron G1840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 217 votes

Rate Pentium J3710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1840 or Pentium J3710, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.