Celeron N2840 vs G1830

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2463not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.23no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.72no data
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Connectno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s21.32 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1830 1560
+166%
Celeron N2840 587

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2013 22 May 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron N2840 has an age advantage of 5 months, and 657.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G1830 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2840 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1830 and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1830
Celeron G1830
Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 632 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1830 or Celeron N2840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.