Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Celeron G1820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
0.97
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
42.45
+4276%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Celeron G1820 by a whopping 4276% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking268172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency0.766.45
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Chagall PRO (2022)
Release date1 December 2013 (11 years ago)8 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$110no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB128 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die size177 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C95 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors-
Max video memory1.7 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+-
VGA+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hz-
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hz-
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12-
OpenGL4.3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

PCIe versionUp to 3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G1820 0.97
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 42.45
+4276%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron G1820 1716
Samples: 436
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 75012
+4271%
Samples: 205

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G1820 482
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 2043
+324%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G1820 807
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 16302
+1920%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 42.45
Recency 1 December 2013 8 March 2022
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron G1820 has 428.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, on the other hand, has a 4276.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G1820 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1820 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1820
Celeron G1820
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 177 votes

Rate Celeron G1820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 39 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G1820 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.