Atom N2850 vs Celeron G1820
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2422 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.12 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Atom |
Power efficiency | 1.89 | no data |
Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
Release date | 1 December 2013 (11 years ago) | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $110 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 177 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1150 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 53 Watt | 6,6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz) |
Max video memory | 1.7 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
VGA | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 11.1/12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850.
PCIe version | Up to 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 December 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 53 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron G1820 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.
Atom N2850, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 783.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G1820 is a desktop processor while Atom N2850 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.