Xeon 6780E vs Celeron G1620T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1620T
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.87
Xeon 6780E
2024
144 cores / 144 threads, 330 Watt
49.35
+5572%

Xeon 6780E outperforms Celeron G1620T by a whopping 5572% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking274546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.401.28
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.056.32
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (12 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$11,350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1620T has 88% better value for money than Xeon 6780E.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620T and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)144
Threads2144
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (per module)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)108 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620T and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620T and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron G1620T and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620T and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620T and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620T and Xeon 6780E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620T and Xeon 6780E.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data88

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G1620T 0.87
Xeon 6780E 49.35
+5572%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron G1620T 1532
Samples: 8
Xeon 6780E 86734
+5561%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 49.35
Recency 1 September 2013 3 June 2024
Physical cores 2 144
Threads 2 144
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 330 Watt

Celeron G1620T has 842.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has a 5572.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 7100% more physical cores and 7100% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6780E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G1620T in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1620T is a desktop processor while Xeon 6780E is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1620T
Celeron G1620T
Intel Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron G1620T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 18 votes

Rate Xeon 6780E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G1620T and Xeon 6780E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.