Celeron G1820TE vs G1620T

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1620T
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.96
+50%
Celeron G1820TE
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
0.64

Celeron G1620T outperforms Celeron G1820TE by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24862756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.40no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.601.12
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size94 mm2177 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C72 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11551150
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD (Haswell)
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1620T 0.96
+50%
Celeron G1820TE 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1620T 1532
+50.2%
Celeron G1820TE 1020

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.64
Recency 1 September 2013 1 December 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 54 Watt

Celeron G1620T has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, and 54.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron G1820TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

The Celeron G1620T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1820TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620T and Celeron G1820TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1620T
Celeron G1620T
Intel Celeron G1820TE
Celeron G1820TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron G1620T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron G1820TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1620T or Celeron G1820TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.