Pentium Gold G5400 vs Celeron G1620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1620
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
0.99
Pentium Gold G5400
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 58 Watt
2.35
+137%

Pentium Gold G5400 outperforms Celeron G1620 by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24791800
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.055.74
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium Gold
Power efficiency1.704.36
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date3 December 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$208$64

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium Gold G5400 has 11380% better value for money than Celeron G1620.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size94 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt58 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key-+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1620 0.99
Pentium Gold G5400 2.35
+137%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1620 1571
Pentium Gold G5400 3738
+138%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G1620 421
Pentium Gold G5400 738
+75.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G1620 736
Pentium Gold G5400 1509
+105%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 2.35
Integrated graphics card 0.77 1.89
Recency 3 December 2012 2 April 2018
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 58 Watt

Celeron G1620 has 5.5% lower power consumption.

Pentium Gold G5400, on the other hand, has a 137.4% higher aggregate performance score, 145.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Pentium Gold G5400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620 and Pentium Gold G5400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1620
Celeron G1620
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
Pentium Gold G5400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 84 votes

Rate Celeron G1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 910 votes

Rate Pentium Gold G5400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1620 or Pentium Gold G5400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.