Performance per price, higher is better.
E2-1800 vs Celeron G1620
General info
Comparing Celeron G1620 and E2-1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2320 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 2.16 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD E-Series |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 3 December 2012 (11 years old) | 6 June 2012 (11 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $208 | no data |
| Current price | $63 (0.3x MSRP) | $135 |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
Celeron G1620 and E2-1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 94 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G1620 and E2-1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1155 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620 and E2-1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V |
| AES-NI | - | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| PowerNow | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| My WiFi | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron G1620 and E2-1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | - | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620 and E2-1800 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620 and E2-1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors | AMD Radeon HD 7340 |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620 and E2-1800 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620 and E2-1800.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron G1620 outperforms E2-1800 by 249% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron G1620 outperforms E2-1800 by 262% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron G1620 outperforms E2-1800 by 281% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 3 December 2012 | 6 June 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 18 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron G1620 and E2-1800. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620 and E2-1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
