Celeron 667 vs G1620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2464not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.69no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Timna
Release date3 December 2012 (11 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$208no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz0.67 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)32 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)128 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm180 nm
Die size94 mm2129 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155370S
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel i752
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 30 Watt

Celeron G1620 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 718.2% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 667, on the other hand, has 83.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620 and Celeron 667, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1620
Celeron G1620
Intel Celeron 667
Celeron 667

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 84 votes

Rate Celeron G1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 667 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1620 or Celeron 667, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.