Celeron 3855U vs G1620

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1620
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
1.02
+27.5%

Celeron G1620 outperforms Celeron 3855U by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24642631
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.694.86
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date3 December 2012 (11 years ago)15 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$208$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate5 GT/s4 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size94 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 510
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data10

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1620 1.02
+27.5%
Celeron 3855U 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1620 1560
+28%
Celeron 3855U 1219

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G1620 415
+31.7%
Celeron 3855U 315

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G1620 725
+34.8%
Celeron 3855U 538

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.02 0.80
Recency 3 December 2012 15 August 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron G1620 has a 27.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 3855U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G1620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3855U in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1620 is a desktop processor while Celeron 3855U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620 and Celeron 3855U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1620
Celeron G1620
Intel Celeron 3855U
Celeron 3855U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 84 votes

Rate Celeron G1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 29 votes

Rate Celeron 3855U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1620 or Celeron 3855U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.