Celeron J1800 vs G1101

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2713	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.97	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	0.89	no data
Architecture codename	Clarkdale (2010−2011)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$85	$72

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.26 GHz	2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed	0.27 GHz	2.58 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	112 KB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Die size	81 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	105 °C
Number of transistors	382 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1156	FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	73 Watt	10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

vPro	-	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	36 Bit
FDI	+	-
RST	no data	-

Security technologies

Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	+
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	16.38 GB	8 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	17 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Graphics max frequency	no data	792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	1	4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	7 January 2010	1 November 2013
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	73 Watt	10 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---