Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Celeron E3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.54
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
25.27
+4580%

Ryzen 7 9800X3D outperforms Celeron E3400 by a whopping 4580% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3400 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2847202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.7244.59
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.7819.82
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date17 January 2010 (14 years ago)7 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$76$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 9800X3D has 1099% better value for money than Celeron E3400.

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3400 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size82 mm270.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3400 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron E3400 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3400 0.54
Ryzen 7 9800X3D 25.27
+4580%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3400 860
Ryzen 7 9800X3D 40138
+4567%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 25.27
Recency 17 January 2010 7 November 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron E3400 has 84.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 9800X3D, on the other hand, has a 4579.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3400 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 273 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 261 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 9800X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3400 or Ryzen 7 9800X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.